(1) This policy is intended to ensure that a positive approach to behaviour management is taken across all the schools of the (2) This policy is intended to enable schools of the Diocese to approach behaviour management in schools in a manner that is consistent with the Catholic Social Teachings: (3) This policy applies to all students and (4) Common terms and definitions are defined in the glossary. (5) Terms and definitions in the table below are specific to this policy and critical to its effectiveness: (6) Catholic Schools in the Diocese will take a proactive and positive approach to developing expected standards of behaviour among all of its students by adopting approaches where all students enrolled are supported and encouraged to: (7) Prohibition on Corporal Punishment: The use of corporal punishment, in all forms, across all learning settings, is expressly prohibited. (8) Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L) will be the supported and preferred proactive approach across all Catholic Schools, promoting the use of evidence-based behavioural strategies for all students to prevent academic and behavioural difficulties and increase the likelihood of success, by developing the functional capabilities of people, preventing behaviours of concern, and creating supportive contexts. (9) Behaviour Support Plans: Behaviour Support Plans assist schools to provide additional support and guidance to identified students, outlining strategies to improve their behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan will guide the actions of others to respond consistently, to reduce the distress of the individual and to keep everybody safe. (10) Adjustments: where students enrolled have identified needs, including due to disability, their needs will be appropriately adjusted for and adjustments will be documented in line with the procedures and guidelines of the Diocese. All reasonable adjustments need to be in place when assessing behaviour against this policy and related procedures and guidelines. In the event behaviour related to a disability occurs without appropriate adjustments being in place, consideration needs to be given to the appropriateness of the response in the context of the disability, reasonable adjustments, risks and impacts of the behaviour. (11) Restrictive Practice: the Diocese seeks to, over time, eliminate the use of restrictive practices in all of its schools. (12) Consequences of Behaviour: clearly defined and established classroom expectations help students to feel safe and secure. The expected behaviours are tied to positive consequences when met, and corrective consequences if unmet/presented: (13) General Safety: all behavioural management strategies and implementation should aim to support both the behaviour and preventing (14) Psychological Safety: any practice or outcome in relation to behavioural management should seek to ensure the psychological safety of all workers, students and members of the school community. (15) Partnerships: Schools need to ensure that they implement and maintain effective systems for collaboration, such as creating staff teams and fostering genuine partnerships with parents. Collaborative partnerships must be developed that engage onsite diocesan agencies who also support identified students who have a behaviour support plan, including St Nicholas (Early Learning and OOSH) and CatholicCare (Beyond The Gates). (16) Any worker found to be in breach of this policy may be subject to disciplinary action, including where a serious breach occurs, dismissal. (17) It is recognised this policy is a new policy and during implementation the following approach will be taken to any action for breach of the policy: (18) If there is any inconsistency between a policy document in existence before the commencement of this policy, and a policy document developed after the commencement of this policy, the latter applies to the extent of the inconsistency. (19) This policy will be reviewed when there is a legislative change, organisational change, delegations change, technology change or at least every 3 years to ensure it continues to be current and effective.Schools Behaviour Management Policy
Section 1 - Purpose
Top of PageSection 2 - Scope
Section 3 - Definitions
Top of Page
Term
Definition
Adjustments
An adjustment is a measure or action taken to assist a student with disability to participate in education and training on the same basis as other students. It can include aids, facilities or services that the student requires because of their disability. (DSE, 2005).
Corporal Punishment
Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L)
Procedural Fairness (or Procedurally Fair)
Restrictive Practice
Section 4 - Responsibilities
Top of Page
Role
Responsibilities
Head of Catholic Schools
Lead the commitment to the policy principles.
Assistant Head Learning & Wellbeing
Develop supporting guidelines and process to support the implementation of this policy, and ensure appropriate resources are available to schools.
Principals
Teachers and school staff
Implement this policy in their practice when supporting and managing the behaviour of students within the school.
Section 5 - Policy Principles
Section 6 - Consequences of Breaching this Policy
Top of PageSection 7 - Notations
Section 8 - Document Review
View Document
This is the current version of this document. You can provide feedback on this document to the document author - refer to the Status and Details on the document's navigation bar.
The definition of the Education Act 1990 is adopted:
“of a student means the application of physical force in order to punish or correct the student, but does not include the application of force only to prevent personal injury to, or damage to or the destruction of property of, any person (including the student).”
A research-based assessment, multi-tiered intervention and decision-making process that involves:
♦ developing the functional capabilities of people;
♦ preventing behaviours of concern; and
♦ creating supportive contexts.
(Barker, Poed, Whitefield, 2023, 4)
Any inquiry or process will afford the respondent and complainant (particularly where the complainant is the alleged victim):
♦ a fair and unbiased process;
♦ all reasonable opportunity to be heard; and
♦ decisions based on the logical and appropriate analysis of available facts.
Fundamental elements of procedural fairness are both that a person who may face consequences as a result of the process is informed that this could be the case at the earliest opportunity; and the right of the respondent to receive sufficient information to make an informed response.
The civil standard of proof (being a balance of probabilities) is applied and assessed in accordance with the Briginshaw principles, that is, the more serious the consequences the more evidence in the affirmative is needed to substantiate a finding.
A procedurally fair process should usually be determined prior to the process commencing, and the process adopted should be commensurate with the seriousness of the allegations made or issues raised as well as be proportionate to the potential consequences of the findings, and may be altered to remain proportionate as further information becomes available.
Means any practice or intervention that has the effect or restricting the rights or freedoms of movement of a person. including:
♦ seclusion;
♦ chemical restraint;
♦ mechanical restraint;
♦ physical restraint; and
♦ environmental restraint.
(NDIS Quality and Safeguarding Commission).
Lead and oversee school staff compliance with this policy, including ensuring all school staff are aware of the policy and their requirements.
Seek support of the Catholic Schools Office (particularly the Assistant Head Learning & Wellbeing) where required for effective implementation.
Lead the development/review of school-based PB4L procedures, based upon the consistent and strategic use of evidence-informed classroom practices.